នៅក្នុងឯកសារមួយចេញផ្សាយកាលពីថ្ងៃអង្គារ ទីស្ដីការគណៈរដ្ឋមន្ត្រីបានអះអាងថា អង្គការសង្គមស៊ីវិលដែលបានចេញផ្សាយរបាយការណ៍មួយរៀបរាប់លម្អិតពីភាពមិនប្រក្រតីនៅក្នុងការបោះឆ្នោតជាតិកាលពីខែកក្កដា កំពុងតែឃុបឃិតគ្នាដើម្បីផ្ដួលរំលំរដ្ឋាភិបាលគណបក្សប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា។
នៅក្នុងរបាយការណ៍មួយដែលមាន៤០ទំព័រឆ្លើយតបនឹងរបាយការណ៍រួមស្ដីពីដំណើរការនៃការបោះឆ្នោតក្នុងឆ្នាំ២០១៣នៅកម្ពុជា ដែលត្រូវបានចេញផ្សាយដោយអង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធកំណែទម្រង់ការបោះឆ្នោតហៅកាត់ថា ERA កាលពីខែធ្នូ អង្គភាពព័ត៌មាន និងប្រតិកម្មរហ័សនៅទីស្ដីការគណៈរដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ក៏លើកឡើងដែរថា អង្គការពាក់ព័ន្ធទាំងនេះត្រូវតែទទួលខុសត្រូវទាំងស្រុង” ជាមួយនឹងក្រុមមេដឹកនាំគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិចំពោះការបាត់បង់អាយុជីវិតរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋនៅក្នុងអំពើហិង្សាក្រោយការបោះឆ្នោត។
របាយការណ៍ខែធ្នូ ដែលផ្អែកលើតួលេខរបស់គណៈកម្មាធិការជាតិរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោត ព្រមទាំងការសិក្សាស្រាវជ្រាវដោយបណ្ដាអ្នកឃ្លាំមើលការបោះឆ្នោតឯករាជ្យផងដែរនេះ បានរកឃើញថា ភាពមិនប្រក្រតីជាទូទៅនៅក្នុងការបោះឆ្នោតដ៏ចម្រូងចម្រាសកាលពីខែកក្កដា បានធ្វើឲ្យគណបក្សប្រជាជនកម្ពុជាកំពុងកាន់អំណាចទទួលជ័យជម្នះ។
លិខិតឆ្លើយតបរបស់អង្គភាពព័ត៌មាននិងប្រតិកម្មរហ័សនៃទីស្ដីការគណៈរដ្ឋមន្ត្រីបានអះអាងថា របាយការណ៍នេះគ្មានភាពឯករាជ្យទេ។ លិខិតឆ្លើយតបដដែលនេះមានខ្លឹមសារដូច្នេះថា “យោងតាមប្រភពអាចទុកចិត្តបានឲ្យដឹងថា ប្រធានអង្គការក្រៅរដ្ឋាភិបាលទាំងនេះជាពិសេសអង្គការមួយដែលពាក់ព័ន្ធនៅក្នុងសកម្មភាពប្រមូលចងក្រងរបាយការណ៍រួមនេះ ទើបតែបានជួបជាមួយលោក សម រង្ស៊ី និងលោក កឹម សុខា ក្នុងពេលថ្មីៗនេះដើម្បីផ្ដល់ប្រឹក្សាដល់ពួកគាត់ពីវិធីផ្ដួលរំលំរដ្ឋាភិបាលតាមរយៈ ‘អំណាចប្រជាជន’ ឬការធ្វើ ‘បដិវត្ត’។ តើសកម្មភាពបែបនេះចាត់ទុកថា ឯករាជ្យឬ?”។
លិខិតឆ្លើយតបនេះបានបន្តទៀតថា ពេលវេលានៃការបញ្ចេញរបាយការណ៍នេះបង្ហាញថា អង្គការដែលមានការពាក់ព័ន្ធទាំងនេះរួមមានទាំងគណៈកម្មាធិការដើម្បីការបោះឆ្នោតដោយសេរីនិងយុត្តិធម៌នៅកម្ពុជាហៅកាត់ថា ខុមហ្វ្រែល និងវិទ្យាស្ថានជាតិប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ ហៅកាត់ថា អិនឌីអាយ ដែលមានមូលដ្ឋាននៅក្នុងសហរដ្ឋអាមេរិកផងដែរនោះ កំពុងសហការគ្នាជាសម្ងាត់ជាមួយគណបក្សប្រឆាំង។ អង្គភាពព័ត៌មាននិងប្រតិកម្មរហ័សបានលើកឡើងថា “របាយការណ៍រួមរបស់ ERA ត្រូវបានចុះផ្សាយក្នុងសប្ដាហ៍ទី២ នៃខែធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ ២០១៣ ស្របគ្នានឹងការផ្លាស់ប្ដូរយុទ្ធសាស្ត្ររបស់គណបក្សប្រឆាំងពីការធ្វើបាតុកម្មប្រចាំសប្ដាហ៍ទៅជាបាតុកម្មប្រចាំថ្ងៃ។ នេះបង្ហាញឲ្យឃើញយ៉ាងច្បាស់ពីទំនាក់ទំនងរវាងរបាយការណ៍រួមនេះ និងបណ្ដាអង្គការរដ្ឋាភិបាលដែលចេញរបាយការណ៍នេះ ទៅនឹងយុទ្ធសាស្ត្រនយោបាយរបស់គណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ ដើម្បីច្រានចោលលទ្ធផលបោះឆ្នោត”។
លិខិតឆ្លើយតបរបស់អង្គភាពព័ត៌មាននិងប្រតិកម្មរហ័សបានសន្និដ្ឋានថា “[របាយការណ៍របស់ ERA” ត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងដើម្បីបង្ខូចដំណើរការនៃការបោះឆ្នោតនៅឆ្នាំ២០១៣ តាមរយៈការបំភ្លៃអង្គហេតុ និងការប្រឌិត និងគោលបំណងធ្វើឲ្យអ្នកអានយល់ថា ប្រព័ន្ធបោះឆ្នោតនៅក្នុងប្រទេសកម្ពុជាមិនយុត្តិធម៌ ធ្វើឡើងដើម្បីគាំទ្រគណបក្សប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា នឹងគ្មានប្រសិទ្ធិភាពជាហេតុធ្វើឲ្យសាធារណជនយល់ខុសថា នេះជាមូលហេតុស្ថិតនៅពីក្រោយបរាជ័យរបស់គណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ”។
អង្គភាពព័ត៌មាននិងប្រតិកម្មរហ័សថែមទាំងបានលើកឡើងទៀតថា អង្គការសង្គមស៊ីវិលទាំងនេះដែលពាក់ព័ន្ធនៅក្នុងរបាយការណ៍នេះ ជាអ្នកទទួលខុសត្រូវចំពោះការស្លាប់របស់បាតុករប្រាំពីរនាក់និងជនស៊ីវិលដែលត្រូវបានកងកម្លាំងសន្ដិសុខជាតិសម្លាប់ក្នុងរយៈពេលប្រាំមួយខែមកនេះ។ អង្គភាពនេះបានលើកឡើងបន្តទៀតថា “អ្នកដែលពាក់ព័ន្ធអង្គការក្រៅរដ្ឋាភិបាលទាំងនោះព្រមទាំងលោក សម រង្ស៊ី និងលោក កឹម សុខា ផង ត្រូវតែទទួលខុសត្រូវទាំងស្រុងចំពោះការនាំឲ្យមានបាតុកម្មអនាធិបតេយ្យដើម្បីប្រើអំពើហិង្សា និងចំពោះការទាមទារផ្ទុយពីរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញនិងគោលការណ៍លទ្ធិប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ ឲ្យលោកនាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រីចុះចេញពីតំណែង ហើយរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោតជាថ្មី”។ អង្គភាពនេះលើកឡើងថា “ពាក់ព័ន្ធនឹងបញ្ហានេះមេដឹកនាំរបស់គណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ ជាពិសេសលោក សម រង្ស៊ី និងលោក កឹម សុខា ហើយនឹង ERA ត្រូវតែទទួលខុសត្រូវចំពោះផលវិបាកព្រមទាំងការបាត់បង់អាយុជីវិតបណ្ដាលមកពីអំពើហិង្សានេះផងដែរ ជាពិសេសផលប៉ះពាល់នៃរបាយការណ៍រួមរបស់ ERA”។
លោក ឯក ថា អ្នកនាំពាក្យអង្គភាពព័ត៌មាននិងប្រតិកម្មរហ័សបានមានប្រសាសន៍ថា លិខិតយ៉ាងវែងរបស់រដ្ឋាភិបាលឆ្លើយតបនឹងរបាយការណ៍របស់ ERA មានសារៈសំខាន់ដើម្បីរក្សាទុកជាឯកសារ បន្ទាប់ពីគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិនិងបណ្ដាអ្នកឃ្លាំមើលការបោះឆ្នោតបានលើកឡើងម្ដងហើយម្ដងទៀតថា ការបោះឆ្នោតកាលពីខែកក្កដា មិនសេរីនិងយុត្តិធម៌។ លោកបានមានប្រសាសន៍ថា “យើងចង់ឲ្យមជ្ឈដ្ឋានជាតិនិងអន្តរជាតិយល់ឲ្យកាន់តែច្បាស់អំពីដំណើរការបោះឆ្នោត ព្រមទាំងឆន្ទៈនយោបាយច្បាស់លាស់របស់រដ្ឋាភិបាលកម្ពុជាផងដែរ”។
លោកស្រី ឡូរ៉ា ថនតុន ប្រធាន NDI ប្រចាំប្រទេសកម្ពុជាបានមានប្រសាសន៍ថា របាយការណ៍របស់ ERA គឺឯករាជ្យទាំងស្រុង មិនស្ថិតក្រោមឥទ្ធិពលនយោបាយឡើយ ហើយភាគច្រើនផ្អែកទៅលើទិន្នន័យរបស់រដ្ឋាភិបាលផ្ទាល់ពាក់ព័ន្ធនឹងការបោះឆ្នោត។ លោកស្រីមានប្រសាសន៍ថា “ខ្ញុំគិតថា [អង្គការសង្គមស៊ីវិល] និងគណបក្សនយោបាយអាចប៉ះទង្គិចគ្នាជាញឹកញាប់ ហើយប្រើជំហរគោលនយោបាយដូចគ្នា ហើយវាមិនមានន័យថា អ្នកកំពុងសហការជាមួយពួកគេនោះទេ”។លោកស្រីបានលើកឡើងបន្ថែមទៀតថា “ខ្ញុំគិតថា វាពិបាកច្រានចោលរបាយការណ៍របស់ ERA ណាស់ ពីព្រោះវាផ្អែកលើទិន្នន័យនិងតួលេខចេញពីរដ្ឋាភិបាលខ្លួនឯង។ ប្រសិនបើអស់លោកជំទាស់នឹងលទ្ធផលនៅក្នុងរបាយការណ៍នេះ មានន័យថា អស់លោកកំពុងតែជំទាស់នឹងព័ត៌មានរបស់រដ្ឋាភិបាលអស់លោកផ្ទាល់”។
លោក គល់ បញ្ញា នាយកប្រតិបត្តិអង្គការខុមហ្វ្រែល មានប្រសាសន៍ថា របាយការណ៍នេះមានបំណងគាំទ្រការស៊ើបអង្កេតលើការបោះឆ្នោតកាលពីខែកក្កដា ហើយនៅតែមានប្រយោជន៍នៅក្នុងការបញ្ចប់វិវាទ នយោបាយដែលកំពុងបន្តកើតមានឡើង ប្រសិនបើគណបក្សប្រជាជនកម្ពុជា និងគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ អង្គុយចុះចរចាគ្នាជុំវិញកំណែទម្រង់បោះឆ្នោតនៅទីបំផុត។ លោក គល់ បញ្ញា មានប្រសាសន៍ថា “ខ្ញុំគិតថា ឥរិយាបទ [របស់រដ្ឋាភិបាល] មិនទាន់កែប្រែដើម្បីបង្ហាញពីការប្ដេជ្ញាចិត្តទទួលយកការធ្វើកំណែទម្រង់ស៊ីជម្រៅនៅឡើយទេ ជាពិសេសកំណែទម្រង់បោះឆ្នោត។ ពួកគេតែងតែមិនអើពើនឹងមតិរិះគន់ទាំងអស់។ ខ្ញុំគិតថា គណបក្សប្រជាជនគួរតែយកអនុសាសន៍របស់យើងទៅពិចារណា។ ប្រហែលជាពួកគេអាចប្រើប្រាស់អនុសាសន៍ទាំងនេះបានដើម្បីឈានដល់ការព្រមព្រៀងគ្នាលើកំណែទម្រង់បោះឆ្នោត”៕ សុខុម
© 2014, ខេមបូឌា ដេលី. រក្សាសិទ្ធិគ្រប់យ៉ាង។ មិនអនុញ្ញាតឲ្យដកស្រង់នូវផ្នែកណាមួយ នៃការចេញផ្សាយនេះ តាមរយៈការបោះពុម្ព តាមប្រព័ន្ធអេឡិចត្រូនិច ផ្សាយតាមរលកធាតុអាកាស សរសេរឡើងវិញ ឬចែកចាយដោយគ្មានការយល់ព្រមជាលាយលក្ខណ៍អក្សរពីចាងហ្វាងការផ្សាយឡើយ។
it is good for the ruling cpp to change its position and behavior to consider adopting the list of recommendations for the election reform, if they really want to have a free, fair, reliable election in the future. the election reform is a must for cambodia at this time. it is time for the two political parties (cpp and cnrp) to return to the table to discuss those recommendations compiled by ERA. these recommendations are useful and necessary forthe government and political parties and the institutions involved to adopt for improving the future elections, in order to avoid problems and conflicts to happen before, during, and after the election. every country in the world, the election reform is conducted if there are several loopholes or conflicts occurred during the election process. ironically, civil society organizations such as ERA is accused of having meddled in the internal affairs of the government and of having conspired with the opposition party in the purpose of overthrowing the government. why is ERA accused? why the government need to link ERA with the opposition because of their work on the election reform? it looks that the government has no commitment on the election reform. on the one hand, it is very unreasonable to hold ERA responsible for the social turmoil and injuries and deaths during the violent crackdown on the peaceful demonstration by the government security forces/armed forces. Rather, the onrd who commanded armed forces to violently dispurse and crackdown on the demonstration must take responsibility before the law and the people and the history. I do not think that ERA has planned attempt to cause a political turmoil or overthrow the government. the accusation/allegation on ERA is not politically motivated and discourage the effort on election reform. my comments might not be accepted by the government and pro cpp/government people. also, I might be accused of being a cnrp supporter or antigovernment. but, in democracy the different political points of view/comments is respected. if everyone wants to have a reliable, fair,free election, please consider adopting the recommendations. further, please give up the nature of the political revenge because of different political position. no khmer is enemy.
Rayuth, your comments is well notice and it’s very vital to understand that democracy excercise is a non violation expression. When their expression turns into violation and creating civilian social unrest is no more democratic practice, therefore stability and order must be well respected and considered. I agree we can express our differences, but not getting through mass conpagning to get all development partners and donors to cut aids, all large scale business companies not doing business in the country, to get all people from all walks including army, police and government officials to stop working to getting strikes, racist against Vietnam and so on so for. These ill intentions are trying to turn this Kingdom to become social unrest and civilian war again. This is 100% sure not a democratic expression, this is a terrorist act at the end of this compagning will overthrow elected government and the country becomes choas.
ខ្ញុំជឿរហើយ មតិរិះគន់់ រាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលលោកមិនដែលទទួលយកម្តងណាទេ? បើលើកសរសើវិញ អស់លោក ខំប្រឹងផ្សព្វផ្សាយពត័មាន ផងនឹងការសែតផង ឡើងល្បីរន្ទឺ បាននៃថា លោកទទួលយកបានត៊េត្រូវទេ ចំឡែកខុសអត់ទទួលទេ?ក្នុងលោកនេះនរណាដែលធ្វើមិនដែលចេះខុសនោះសម្តេច៕
Now the truth is coming out! This is the real conspiracy that ERA , COMFREL and NDI are filing the false reports and misleading the facts that make it look like the election July 28 2013 was not free and fair! Big deal! I have been watching the news from every different networks regarding the election in Cambodia, I suspect that these Organizations are the allies of CNRP for a long time. These organizations are throwing the books at CPP and NEC accusing them for irregularity. No wonder any time, whenever the CNRP are complaining a bout the election problem COMFREL are backing them up all the time. They know what’s going on!!
Now that the ERA , NDI and COMFREL give their recommendation regarding on the election reform to be free and fair as long as this recommendation is working on the CNRP ‘s behalf!
These biased Organizations must be responsible for the chaos in Cambodia.
well, Borimei Preah Vihear. you have the complete rights to express your arguments. yoh van have different points of view on the isues. this is about democracy. I believe that you can understand. but, you ought to remember that in democracy, armed forces/security forces and weapons are not used to violently disperse and crackdow on the civic protestor demonstration causing fatalities. i do not see that the previous demonstration as an act of terrotism.but. it is a way to express disagreements and disatifactions. walking on streets cannot be considered illegal because In democracy. such protest is allowed. I observed that armed forces are used or command by a group of dictators in some countries such as chile, egypt the philippines, burma, indonesia,venuzeala, the communist china, etc, in order to intimidate, threaten, crackdown, kill the opposition and people who have different ideas criticizing the government. they considered used armed forces/security forces as a tool to maintain and strengthen their power base. in democracy, the opposition is welcome and allowed the rights and freedoms to carry out political activities to sell the political platform and policy to the citizens.and citizens have the rights to buy or not to buy. political meetings and rallies with people, supporters and
members of their political party are permitted as stated in the domestic laws (political party law and constitution) and international covenant on civic and political rights. and they must not be obstructed and intimidatec by anyone. in the political science, there are three main factors to be applied by politicians to gain support from citizens and to strengthen power: first, use money to buy mind and support from the people; second, use armed force and the court to intimidate, threaten, crackdown to gain support and to maintain the power; third, use persuassion to have support. realistically, option one and two are not stable, but the dictators love to apply. while the option 3 is stable. in cambodis, which of options has been/are applied by politicians and leaders? I hope that my beloved cambodians wil make judgement. additionally, I wish that the situation of rights and freedoms be restored anf politicians are free to hold public meetings with people, acitivists. members without intimidation and obstruction. also, I wish that the ptinciple of level the playing field be accepted and applied among political parties in cambodia.
you can have different points of view on the issues.
ពួកអាNGO អាសង្គមសុីវិលទាំងនេះ វាដើរនិយាយប្រាប់ប្រជាជនដោយចំហ ចំៗ
តាំងពីមុន និងកំពុងឃោសនាបោះឆ្នោតម្ល៉េះថា មីងមាបងប្អូនអើយ មិនបាច់ខំប្រឹងទេ
ទោះបី ហុនសែនជាប់ កគេមិនអោយជាប់ដែរ…(((មិនដឹងថាគេនោះជានរណាទេ)))
តាំងពីចេញលទ្ឋផលបោះឆ្នោត និងលេចចេញសកម្មភាពមកទល់សព្វថ្ងៃនេះ ទើបដឹងថា
“គេ”នោះជាអ្នកណាខ្លះ…សូមCPPជ្រាប…។
in most part I’m agree with both of you between these two political parties. CPP&CRNP. I understanding that democracy in CAMBODIA is still young. but democracy practice shout be free and fair to all parties.it is the responsibility for every party that involving in some disagreement that happen during election and after election. to be honor to your nation and stability in the whole country. there is no institution in the world that said they can not have a new election after every parties found out it was not free and fair. the violation and un stability will ac cure in that societies . I’m not agree that CRNP is trying to overthrow the government . there is no government yet . what pion can I say that. one party ruling in the country can not call democracy country .My question is why CPP was fear of having a new election again? that was only solution left for this nation. why all these party great more suffering for this nation. on some comment was not reflecting to both side. about racist I do not think CAMBODIA are racist nation. I knew the history of CAMBODIA and VIETNAM .for many decade CAMBODIA has been off and on from invasion of VIETNAME government. and recently CAMBODIA lost a lot of land and island to VIETNAM. VIETNAME was a small notion that run away from CHINA communist revolution. for all of these situation all party have to face white political deference .all CAMBODIAN over sea knew that sooner or later even if no CRNP CAMBODIA will be a big disaster that can not be fixing. please try to thing deeply to honor your nation. it just like the word from the old said. when you can not see the coffin you not cry yet. and when you see the coffin it is too late. thank you for reading my comment. I’m wishing Peace will happen to all CAMBODIAN every soon
My response for Boromei PREAS VIHEAR:
Mr Rayuth you still don’t understand Democracy at all! People who live in the countries of Democracy have the right to express their feelings in the public through their mass demonstration as long as they do it within the law. If these demonstrations are out of bound such as: violating other people’s right destroying private and public properties then the security forces must crack down on those lawless people that caused severe damages to the other people’s businesses.
In the United States back in 1991 , the mass peaceful demonstration became riots by burning the business buildings and government buildings in the city of Las Angeles California.
The US government imposed the MARTIAL LAW on the city of L.A. National Guards were in places to crackdown on those lawless people which resulted many people are dead and arrested.
Some people misunderstand Democracy like yourself in Cambodia that’s why we have problems!
Those protesters in Cambodia destroyed the factories and the clinic which belong to the privates.
Do you know that either the Clinic or Hospital are protected by the International Law from harming both the medical staffs and the medical buildings even if in the war time?
I do believe that the crackdown on the violent protest is justified ! This is a crime not the freedom of expression as you pointed out.
Mony Nop in Long Beach California USA
Well, You have the complete rights to express your arguments. You can have different points of view on the issues. This is about democracy. I believe that you can understand. But, you ought to remember that in democracy, armed forces/security forces and weapons are not used to violently disperse and crackdown on the civic protestor demonstration causing fatalities. i do not see that the previous demonstration as an act of terrorism .Bu, it is a way to express disagreements and dissatisfactions. Walking on streets cannot be considered illegal because in democracy. Such protest is allowed. I observed that armed forces are used or command by a group of dictators in some countries such as Chile, Egypt, the Philippines, Burma, Indonesia, Venezuela, the communist china, etc., in order to intimidate, threaten, crackdown, kill the opposition and people who have different ideas criticizing the government. They considered used armed forces/security forces as a tool to maintain and strengthen their power base.
In democracy, the opposition is welcome and allowed the rights and freedoms to carry out political activities to sell the political platform and policy to the citizens. And citizens have the rights to buy or not to buy. Political meetings and rallies with people, supporters and members of their political party are permitted as stated in the domestic laws (political party law and constitution) and international covenant on civil and political rights. And they must not be obstructed and intimidated by anyone. In the political science, there are three main factors to be applied by politicians to gain support from citizens and to strengthen power: first, use money to buy mind and support from the people; second, use armed force and the court to intimidate, threaten, crackdown to gain support and to maintain the power; third, use persuasion to have support. Realistically, option one and two are not stable, but the dictators love to apply. While, the option 3 is stable. In Cambodia, which of options has been/are applied by politicians and leaders? I hope that my beloved Cambodians will make judgment. Additionally, I wish that the situation of rights and freedoms be restored and politicians are free to hold public meetings with people, activists, members without intimidation and obstruction. Also, I wish that the principle of level the playing field be accepted and applied among political parties in Cambodia.
Moreover, i wish that that armed forces and the court be neutral and independent of political influence or are not under the control of any powerful politician. These two institutions ought to play neutral and independent role for the sake of the nation, rather than any politican or/and political party or group. Cambodia needs to do lots of reforms included judicial and legal reform, public administartion reform, election reform, etc. in order to strengthen the rule of law and promote democracy in the country. Hopefully, these will happen.
I agree white you RAYUTH from me CHEA
rayuth, you.need to write in Khmer like me …cause Mr. HunSen can not read you English! He fogot to choose English language as a foreign country language when he finish his doctorate degree in his backyard ????……..ha……ha
thanks, chea. I just wanted to express arguments and examples happened in other countries, and between the dictatorial and democratic pholosophy on politics. Chea, please keep in mind that in the political science, three key options/factors (it is called “P3”) to be applied by politicians or leaders to gain support from people/voters or to maintain and enhance power: first, pettey cash(money) to buy mind and support; second, power to intimidate and threaten in order to gain support (or use armed force to intimidate); third, persuasion to gain support. the option 1&2 is not stable. but these are favorite for the notorious leaders or politicians to have support and to maintain power. rather, option 3 is stable and favorite for democrats. further, the dictatorial government maintain and intensify their power base through armed forces and the biased court. these institutions are used as an effective tool to intimidate, threaten, crackdown on the opposition. which of three P has been/is used by leaders and politicians in cambodia? cambodians and you can make judgement on your own. BUT, situation of rights and freedoms and human rights in Cambodia ought to be restored. further, the court shall be neutral and independent of political influence.
I,khmer, thanks for your advice. I see that your suggestion is pretty good. tell you the truth that I want to write in Khmer.but my hand phone has no khmer font. I also think think if my writing or comments in khmer, readers can read and understand about my comments. Sorry, all readers.
When could some of Cambodian leaders and politicians give up the nature of violence or violent gene? some of leaders and politicians publicly boasted that they hold many PhD degrees and some men received medals from the international schools or institutions, but still have violent behavior or gene. could this violent behavior be changed while being a leader or politician?